Insight
Trade Volatility: Adopting a "Trump Majeure Clause" in Commercial Contracts
In today’s disrupted global trade environment, where policy shifts and trade sanctions can emerge unexpectedly, buyers and sellers of goods face heightened legal and financial uncertainty and risk. Sudden changes in trade laws, particularly tariffs and sanctions, can materially affect contract performance and pricing. To mitigate these risks, parties to commercial contracts may benefit from incorporating a tailored provision, which we shall refer to as the "Trump Majeure Clause" (TMC). The TMC is a hybrid of the traditional force majeure clause and a change in law clause, designed specifically to address disruptions caused by newly imposed tariffs or trade sanctions. Its purpose is to allow contractual flexibility in the face of government actions that frustrate the original purpose of entering into the agreement.
08 May 2025
Insight
What A Motorcycle IP Case Says About Parallel Int'l Litigation
In global industries such as electronics and consumer products, parallel intellectual property litigation in multiple forums has become a key tool in the sophisticated litigants' toolbox.
13 December 2024
Insight
United States Federal Court Rules that China’s Secrecy Laws Are Insufficient Basis to Refuse Producing Relevant Documents in Discovery
In No. 4:13-cv-01895 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 27, 2024) (“Opinion”), the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri addressed the issue of whether the secrecy laws of another country may prevent discovery in the United States. Specifically, the Plaintiff filed a motion to compel the Defendants to respond to discovery seeking sales information regarding the products accused of infringing the Plaintiff's patents. In opposing the Plaintiff's motion, the Defendants requested a protective order barring the production of such information under Chinese secrecy law. The Defendants urged that a protective order should be granted because the production of information responsive to the Plaintiff's discovery requests could expose Defendants to broad sanctions under the People's Republic of China's (PRC) recently enacted Counterespionage Law. The Defendants relied on the declaration of a Chinese attorney and a letter from the local Bureau of Commerce. The district court acknowledged that it had previously rejected arguments based on China’s Data Security Laws, its Cybersecurity Law, and its Personal Information Protection Law and similarly concluded that the threat of sanctions under the Counterespionage Law was speculative. As such, the court granted the Plaintiff's motion to compel and denied the Defendants' motion for a protective order. dispute resolution and litigation-cross border investigation and litigation
24 October 2024